State NIL laws.
A state-by-state map of NIL statutes — disclosure thresholds, agent registration, school-payment carve-outs, and the rules that override the rest.
Overview
State laws in context
State NIL laws were the original engine of the NIL era. Florida passed the first operative law in 2020, and by mid-2021 over 25 states had legislation in force — pressure that drove the NCAA to lift its own restrictions nationwide.
The legal landscape has shifted under those state laws since they were enacted:
House Settlement (2025).
Established direct revenue sharing between schools and athletes. Most state laws were drafted assuming a third-party-only NIL world and do not address the new school-as-payor reality. Where state law is silent, the settlement framework controls.
Trump executive order (April 2026).
Directs the Attorney General to challenge state laws that conflict with athletic-governance rules or burden interstate commerce. State laws creating compensation rules inconsistent with the settlement framework may face federal challenge.
SCORE Act (pending).
If enacted, the SCORE Act would preempt state and local laws on athlete compensation, benefits, employment status, eligibility, and academic standards. The bill is currently stalled (see Federal Legislation under House Settlement).
Common amendment patterns since 2021.
Several states have amended their original NIL laws to remove disclosure requirements, expand permissible institutional involvement, address agent registration, or align with the post-settlement school-payment model. The summaries below reflect each state's current law as of the date noted; some 2021-era provisions may have been superseded by later amendments.
What this page covers: state-by-state status, enactment date, legislation citation, summary, and key provisions. Where amendments are known, the most recent operative bill is named.
35
States with NIL laws
16
No specific legislation
2021
Year NIL era began
Click a state
Hover a state to preview · click to jump to its summary.
- Alabama·
- Alaska·
- Arizona·
- Arkansas·
- California·
- Colorado·
- Connecticut·
- Delaware·
- Florida·
- Georgia·
- Hawaii·
- Idaho·
- Illinois·
- Indiana·
- Iowa·
- Kansas·
- Kentucky·
- Louisiana·
- Maine·
- Maryland·
- Massachusetts·
- Michigan·
- Minnesota·
- Mississippi·
- Missouri·
- Montana·
- Nebraska·
- Nevada·
- New Hampshire·
- New Jersey·
- New Mexico·
- New York·
- North Carolina·
- North Dakota·
- Ohio·
- Oklahoma·
- Oregon·
- Pennsylvania·
- Rhode Island·
- South Carolina·
- South Dakota·
- Tennessee·
- Texas·
- Utah·
- Vermont·
- Virginia·
- Washington·
- Washington D.C.·
- West Virginia·
- Wisconsin·
- Wyoming
AL · NCAA policy
Alabama
Original NIL Act (SB 272, 2021) REPEALED in 2022; no NIL-specific statute currently in force
Alabama was an early NIL state, with SB 272 signed by Governor Kay Ivey on April 20, 2021 and effective July 2021. On February 3, 2022, Governor Ivey signed legislation repealing the state's NIL Act after lawmakers concluded the state framework was more restrictive than the NCAA interim policy that took effect shortly after — putting Alabama institutions at a recruiting disadvantage. Alabama currently has no NIL-specific statute. Athletes at Alabama institutions operate under NCAA policy, the House Settlement framework, and institutional rules. The Alabama Athletes Agents Regulatory Act (Ala. Code § 8-26B-1 et seq.) remains in force and governs athlete agent licensing in the state.
Key provisions.
- No NIL-specific Alabama statute is currently in force (original law repealed February 2022)
- Athletes operate under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework
- Alabama Athletes Agents Regulatory Act (Ala. Code § 8-26B-1 et seq.) governs licensing of sports agents in the state
- Institutions and conferences set their own NIL compliance rules at Alabama institutions including Alabama, Auburn, UAB, South Alabama, and others
AK · NCAA policy
Alaska
No specific legislation
Alaska has not enacted specific NIL legislation. Student-athletes in Alaska follow NCAA and/or NAIA policies, including the post-July 2021 interim NIL policy that permits compensation through third-party deals.
Key provisions.
- Governed by NCAA/NAIA interim NIL policy
- No state-law restrictions on NIL activities
- School policies govern disclosure and conflict-of-interest rules
AZ · Law enacted
Arizona
A.R.S. § 15-1892 (originally SB 1296, 2021) · Effective July 23, 2021
Arizona's NIL law (SB 1296) was enacted on March 26, 2021 with an effective date of July 23, 2021 and is codified at Arizona Revised Statutes § 15-1892. The statute focuses on conflict-with-team-contract and intellectual-property protections rather than the explicit product-category bans (alcohol, gambling, etc.) seen in many other state NIL laws. Following the House Settlement, Division I Arizona schools that opt in may directly compensate athletes for NIL under the federal settlement framework.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may hire agents and professional advisors for NIL
- Institutions may not prevent NIL activities that do not conflict with existing team or institutional agreements
- Group licensing permitted
- Athletes retain NIL rights after enrollment
- Statute does not include explicit product-category bans (alcohol, gambling, etc.)
- Direct school payment governed by House Settlement opt-in for D-I institutions
Sources
AR · Law enacted
Arkansas
HB 1671 (NIL framework); HB 1649 (institutional involvement amendment); HB 1717 (2025-2026 tax exemption) · Effective Amended HB 1649 (institutional facilitation); tax exemption effective Jan 1, 2026
Arkansas's NIL framework allows student-athletes to profit from their NIL with prohibitions on contracts tied to adult entertainment, alcohol, gambling, tobacco, marijuana, and other categories specifically outlawed by governing bodies. HB 1649 subsequently amended the law to allow Arkansas universities to facilitate and otherwise enable NIL opportunities for athletes and to allow tax-exempt collectives to directly compensate athletes for publicity rights. Starting January 1, 2026, Arkansas student-athletes are exempt from state income tax on NIL earnings paid directly by colleges or universities — the first such state exemption in the country.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may earn NIL compensation; prohibited categories include adult entertainment, alcohol, gambling, tobacco, and marijuana
- Universities may facilitate and enable NIL opportunities for athletes (post-HB 1649 amendment)
- Tax-exempt collectives may directly compensate athletes for publicity rights
- Effective January 1, 2026: NIL earnings paid directly by an Arkansas institution are exempt from state income tax
- Athletes must disclose contract terms to a designated university official
- Athlete representation must be licensed in Arkansas
CA · Law enacted
California
Cal. Educ. Code § 67456 (originally SB 206, 2019; subsequently amended) · Effective September 1, 2021
California's Fair Pay to Play Act (SB 206) was the first NIL law signed in the United States in September 2019. The original effective date was January 1, 2023, but subsequent amendments accelerated operative effect to September 1, 2021 — aligning with the NCAA's interim NIL policy. The statute is now codified at California Education Code § 67456 and applies to California Community Colleges as well as four-year institutions.
Key provisions.
- First NIL law signed in the United States (2019)
- Postsecondary institutions may not prevent a student-athlete from earning compensation from the use of their name, image, likeness, or athletic reputation
- Scholarship cannot be revoked as a result of earning NIL compensation or obtaining legal representation
- A team contract entered, modified, or renewed after enactment may not prevent an athlete from using their NIL for commercial purposes outside official team activities
- Applies to California Community Colleges in addition to four-year institutions
- Athletes retain the right to professional representation (agents, attorneys) for NIL deals
CO · Law enacted
Colorado
HB 21-1232 (original); SB 23-293 (2023); HB 25-1041 (2025, direct institutional payment + privacy) · Effective July 1, 2021 (substantially amended 2025)
Colorado's NIL law was originally enacted as HB 21-1232 in 2021. The General Assembly amended the framework via SB 23-293 in 2023 and substantially expanded it via HB 25-1041 in 2025, signed by Governor Polis. The 2025 amendment authorizes Colorado universities to directly compensate student-athletes for NIL aligned with the House Settlement, creates a new Colorado Open Records Act (CORA) exception protecting athlete identities and personally identifiable information in institutional NIL contracts, and requires institutions to report aggregated NIL spending to the Department of Higher Education annually, broken down by gender and sport.
Key provisions.
- Colorado public universities may directly compensate student-athletes for NIL under the House Settlement framework
- Institutional NIL contracts and athlete identifying information are exempt from the Colorado Open Records Act (CORA)
- Institutions must annually report aggregated NIL spending to the Department of Higher Education — broken down by gender and sport
- Schools must provide financial literacy and life skills education to athletes
- Athletes may earn NIL compensation without losing eligibility
- Group licensing rights recognized
CT · Law enacted
Connecticut
Public Act 21-132 (original); Public Act 22-11 (2022, logo provisions); HB 6446 (2025, revenue sharing) · Effective July 1, 2021 (substantially amended through 2025)
Connecticut's NIL law has evolved across three legislative cycles. The original Public Act 21-132 (2021) established NIL rights but prohibited use of university trademarks and logos. Public Act 22-11 (2022) repealed that prohibition and authorized athletes to use institutional names, logos, trademarks, mascots, and colors. HB 6446 (2025) added direct revenue sharing and endorsement contracts in preparation for House Settlement implementation. Public higher education institutions entering revenue-sharing agreements with athletes must report annually beginning January 1, 2026 to the Higher Education and Employment Advancement Committee on total compensation amounts and number of athletes compensated.
Key provisions.
- Direct revenue sharing from Connecticut institutions to athletes is authorized (HB 6446, 2025)
- Athletes may use university names, logos, trademarks, mascots, and colors in NIL endorsements
- Athletes may sign endorsement contracts via the institution or authorized entities
- Athletes may monetize social media, sell autographs, run camps and clinics, and engage agents/attorneys
- Public institutions must annually report revenue-share data to the Higher Education and Employment Advancement Committee starting January 1, 2026
- Anti-retaliation protections for athletes engaging in permitted NIL activities
DE · Law enacted
Delaware
HB 199 (2021) · Effective September 1, 2021
Delaware's NIL law (HB 199) was enacted in 2021 and became operative for the 2021-2022 academic year. The statute permits student-athletes to earn NIL compensation, hire agent representation, and protects scholarship status from revocation based on NIL earnings. The law includes a specific list of prohibited endorsement categories and a prior-disclosure requirement.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may hire agent representation for NIL interests
- Prohibited endorsement categories: adult entertainment, alcohol, gambling, tobacco, pharmaceuticals, controlled dangerous substances, and weapons
- Athletes may not use school marks (logos, trademarks, mascots) in personal NIL activities; team contracts may use athlete NIL for marketing without additional compensation
- Prior disclosure to the institution required
- Violations may result in scholarship loss
- NIL contracts may not conflict with team or institutional contracts
FL · Law enacted
Florida
Fla. Stat. § 1006.74 (originally SB 646, 2020; amended by HB 7B, 2023) · Effective July 1, 2021 (amended 2023)
Florida was the first state to have an operative NIL law, signing SB 646 in June 2020 with a July 1, 2021 effective date that pressured the NCAA to loosen its own rules nationwide. In February 2023, Florida amended the statute via HB 7B, removing the prior restrictions on institutional involvement, professional-team compensation, and athlete disclosure — making Florida one of the most permissive NIL states.
Key provisions.
- First operative state NIL law in the nation (2020)
- Athletes have the statutory right to control and profit from the commercial use of their name, image, and likeness
- Institutions are not restricted from facilitating NIL activities (post-2023 amendment removed prior prohibitions)
- No state-law disclosure requirement (removed in 2023 amendment)
- Institutions must conduct two mandatory 5-hour financial literacy workshops per academic year — covering entrepreneurship, financial aid, debt management, budgeting, and time management (Fla. Stat. § 1006.74)
- Athlete agents must be licensed separately under Fla. Stat. Ch. 468, Part IX
GA · Law enacted
Georgia
HB 617 (2021, amended 2024) · Effective July 1, 2021 (amended 2024)
Georgia's NIL law is HB 617, signed by Governor Kemp in May 2021 and effective July 1, 2021. The original version contained a unique provision permitting institutions to require student-athletes to pool up to a portion of their NIL compensation into an escrow account distributed pro-rata one year after graduation. HB 617 originally contained a sunset provision tying its duration to the earlier of federal NIL legislation or June 30, 2025; the General Assembly amended the statute in 2024 to extend operative effect and align with the post-House Settlement environment.
Key provisions.
- Student-athletes at Georgia postsecondary institutions may earn NIL compensation
- Institutions and athletic associations may not prevent or penalize NIL activities
- Athletes may engage agents and attorneys for NIL representation
- Original statute permitted institutional pooling of up to roughly 75% of athlete NIL compensation into an escrow distributed post-graduation (verify current operative status under 2024 amendment)
- 2024 amendment addressed the original sunset provision and conformed Georgia law to the post-House Settlement direct-payment era
HI · NCAA policy
Hawaii
No specific legislation
Hawaii has not enacted specific NIL legislation. Institutions follow NCAA or NAIA policies. There have been deliberations in the legislature but no bill has been passed to date.
Key provisions.
- NCAA/NAIA policy governs
- No state law restrictions on NIL activities
ID · NCAA policy
Idaho
No enacted state NIL statute
Idaho has not enacted a state NIL statute. Athletes at Idaho institutions (Boise State, Idaho, Idaho State) operate under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework. Idaho lawmakers have introduced resolutions urging Congress to create a national framework but have not passed a state-level NIL law. High school NIL is permitted under Idaho High School Activities Association rules effective for the 2022-23 academic year.
Key provisions.
- No state NIL statute is in force
- College athletes operate under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework
- Institutional rules at Boise State, Idaho, Idaho State, and others govern compliance
- High school NIL is governed by Idaho High School Activities Association rules (not state law)
IL · Law enacted
Illinois
SB 2338 (2021 original); HB 1175 (2022 amendment); HB 307 (2025 amendment) · Effective July 1, 2021 (substantially amended; HB 307 effective January 1, 2025)
Illinois's NIL law (SB 2338) was signed by Governor Pritzker on June 29, 2021 and took effect July 1, 2021. The General Assembly amended the law via HB 1175 (May 2022) and substantially expanded it via HB 307, effective January 1, 2025. The 2025 amendment removes limitations on NIL compensation methods, permits Illinois colleges to directly pay athletes when responding to a court order or as a recruiting incentive, expands the definition of student-athlete to cover pre- and post-enrollment periods, exempts NIL agreements from public records disclosure, and clarifies that athletes are not employees of their institutions.
Key provisions.
- Illinois institutions may directly pay athletes in response to a court order or as a recruiting incentive (HB 307, 2025)
- Student-athletes are explicitly not employees of their schools or athletic associations
- NIL agreements are exempt from public records disclosure
- Definition of student-athlete includes pre-enrollment and post-enrollment periods
- Schools may offer non-monetary incentives to encourage outside NIL support
- Covers 2-year and 4-year institutions; financial literacy resources required
- Group licensing rights recognized; professional advisory services permitted
Sources
IN · NCAA policy
Indiana
No enacted NIL statute (HB 1217, 2021 — died in chamber)
Indiana — home to the NCAA's national headquarters — has not enacted state NIL legislation. A bipartisan bill (HB 1217) was introduced in February 2021 but died in chamber. Athletes at Indiana institutions (Indiana, Purdue, Notre Dame, Ball State, Indiana State, others) operate under NCAA policy, the House Settlement framework, and individual institutional rules.
Key provisions.
- No state NIL statute is in force
- Athletes operate under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework
- Institutional rules at each Indiana college or university govern compliance and disclosure
IA · NCAA policy
Iowa
No enacted state NIL statute (SF 245/SF 386 advanced through committee but did not become law)
Iowa has not enacted a state NIL statute. An NIL bill was proposed by Senators Boulton and Zaun in 2021 and advanced through subcommittee and committee, but did not become law — the NCAA's interim NIL policy taking effect July 1, 2021 made the state-level effort moot. Athletes at Iowa institutions (Iowa, Iowa State, Northern Iowa, Drake) operate under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework.
Key provisions.
- No state NIL statute is in force
- Athletes operate under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework
- Iowa High School Athletic Association separately regulates high school NIL via policy
KS · NCAA policy
Kansas
No enacted NIL statute (HB 2264, 2021 — died in Senate, May 2022)
Kansas has not enacted state NIL legislation. House Bill 2264 — which would have permitted student-athletes at Kansas postsecondary institutions to receive NIL compensation — died in the Kansas Senate on May 23, 2022. Athletes at Kansas institutions (Kansas, Kansas State, Wichita State, others) operate under NCAA policy, the House Settlement framework, and institutional rules. The Kansas State High School Activities Association separately regulates NIL for high school athletes via a 2021 policy.
Key provisions.
- No state NIL statute is in force
- Athletes operate under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework
- Institutional rules at each Kansas college or university govern compliance and disclosure
- High school NIL is governed by Kansas State High School Activities Association rules (not state law)
KY · Law enacted
Kentucky
Originally Executive Order 2021-418 (Gov. Beshear, 2021); codified by SB 6 (signed March 9, 2022); amended by SB 3 (2025) · Effective 2022 (substantially amended 2025)
Kentucky's NIL framework began with Executive Order 2021-418 issued by Governor Beshear in 2021, formalized into statute via SB 6 in 2022. In 2025, Governor Beshear signed SB 3 substantially expanding the law to permit Kentucky institutions to directly pay athletes through revenue-sharing arrangements — a direct response to the House Settlement framework.
Key provisions.
- Kentucky institutions may directly compensate student-athletes through revenue sharing (SB 3, 2025)
- Permitted NIL activities include sponsorships, endorsements, appearances, autographs, podcasts, private lessons, and crowdfunding
- Institutions and athletic associations may not restrict permitted NIL activities
- Athletes retain right to agent and attorney representation
- Scholarship status protected from revocation based on NIL earnings
LA · Law enacted
Louisiana
SB 60 (2021 original); SB 250 (2022 amendment); SB 465 (2024 amendment) · Effective July 1, 2021 (amended 2022 and 2024)
Louisiana's NIL law (SB 60) was passed by the Legislature on July 1, 2021. The General Assembly amended the law via SB 250 (June 2022) to relax restrictions and via SB 465 (May 2024) to address direct institutional involvement and agent registration. Athletes may earn NIL compensation through endorsements, appearances, and other business endeavors. A separate state law requires athlete agents working with Louisiana college athletes to register with the Attorney General. Governor Landry has issued an executive order supporting student-athlete NIL compensation aligned with the House Settlement framework.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may earn NIL compensation at market value from endorsements, appearances, and business endeavors
- Universities, athletic conferences, and the NCAA may not prevent athletes from earning permitted NIL compensation
- Athlete agents working with Louisiana college athletes must register with the state Attorney General
- Anti-restriction provisions on institutions; relaxation of original limits in 2022 and 2024 amendments
- Governor's executive order supports direct institutional NIL compensation under the House Settlement
Sources
ME · Law enacted
Maine
Student Athlete NIL Act (passed and effective March 31, 2022) · Effective March 31, 2022
Maine enacted a Student Athlete NIL law that became effective March 31, 2022. The statute prohibits colleges and universities from preventing athletes from earning NIL compensation, permits athletes to earn compensation from selling autographs, and explicitly states that athletes are not employees of their institutions based on athletic participation. The law also bars athletic associations from penalizing Maine institutions for their athletes' compliant NIL activities.
Key provisions.
- Institutions may not prevent athletes from earning NIL compensation
- Athletes may earn compensation from sale of autographs
- Athletes are not considered employees of the institution based on athletic participation
- Athletic associations may not penalize Maine institutions for compliant athlete NIL activities
- Covers Maine institutions including the University of Maine and others
MD · Law enacted
Maryland
Jordan McNair Safe and Fair Play Act (SB 439, 2022); codified at Md. Educ. Code § 15-131 · Effective July 1, 2023
Maryland's NIL law — the Jordan McNair Safe and Fair Play Act (SB 439) — was signed by Governor Hogan and authorizes Maryland college athletes to receive NIL compensation and retain agent representation without penalty to eligibility. The Act became operative for compensation purposes beginning July 1, 2023, codified at Maryland Education Code § 15-131. A 2025 Maryland task force is studying the NIL framework and may signal further updates.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may receive NIL compensation and retain agent representation without losing eligibility
- Athletes must disclose NIL contracts to their institution; contracts may not conflict with the school's athletic program contracts
- Athletes may not use their school's name, logos, or trademarks to market their individual NIL rights
- Covers all Maryland higher education institutions
- 2025 Maryland task force is reviewing the framework for potential further amendments
MA · NCAA policy
Massachusetts
No enacted NIL statute; H.1930 pending in 2025-2026 session
Massachusetts has not enacted state NIL legislation. Athletes operate under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework. H.1930, introduced February 27, 2025, would establish a comprehensive NIL framework — including 72-hour disclosure, agent registration with a 15% fee cap, Attorney General oversight, institutional NIL compliance officers, and privacy protections — with a proposed effective date of July 1, 2027. The bill was reported favorably in December 2025 and is currently in Senate Ways and Means.
Key provisions.
- No enacted statute; college athletes operate under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework
- Pending H.1930 would (if enacted) cap agent fees at 15% of gross compensation
- Pending H.1930 would require institutional NIL compliance officers and AG oversight
- Covers Boston College, Harvard, BU, UMass, Northeastern, and other MA institutions
MI · Law enacted
Michigan
HB 5217 (signed by Gov. Whitmer) · Effective December 31, 2022
Michigan's NIL law is HB 5217, signed by Governor Gretchen Whitmer and effective December 31, 2022. The statute covers all Michigan postsecondary institutions, including the University of Michigan, Michigan State, Western Michigan, Central Michigan, and others. The law combines broad NIL rights with a prior-disclosure requirement and a specific list of prohibited product categories.
Key provisions.
- Institutions, the NCAA, and athletic conferences may not prevent a student-athlete from fully participating in collegiate athletics based on earning NIL compensation or obtaining professional representation
- Athletes must disclose proposed NIL contracts to the institution at least seven days before entering into them, for institutional review
- Prohibited endorsement categories: alcohol, tobacco, gambling, weapons, pharmaceuticals, banned athletic substances, drugs or drug paraphernalia, and adult entertainment
- NIL contracts may not conflict with the institution's contracts, policies, or rules
- Agent and attorney representation permitted; institutional retaliation prohibited
MN · NCAA policy
Minnesota
No enacted state NIL statute (HF 3329 died in 2020)
Minnesota has not enacted a state NIL statute. HF 3329, which would have permitted student-athlete compensation and representation, died with its last action on February 13, 2020. Athletes at Minnesota institutions (Minnesota, Minnesota State Mankato, St. Cloud State, others) operate under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework.
Key provisions.
- No state NIL statute is in force
- Athletes operate under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework
- Institutional rules at Minnesota colleges and universities govern compliance
MS · Law enacted
Mississippi
SB 2313 (2021 original); 2022 amendment; Mississippi Intercollegiate Athletics Compensation and Publicity Rights Act (signed April 18, 2024) · Effective July 1, 2021 (substantially amended through 2024)
Mississippi's NIL law (SB 2313) took effect July 1, 2021. The legislature amended the law in April 2022 to loosen institutional involvement restrictions and update timing for prospective and current athlete NIL agreements. On April 18, 2024, Mississippi enacted the Intercollegiate Athletics Compensation and Publicity Rights Act, which expressly authorizes individuals being recruited by or enrolled in Mississippi postsecondary institutions to engage in NIL activities and aligns the state's framework with the House Settlement era.
Key provisions.
- Athletes recruited by or enrolled in Mississippi postsecondary institutions may engage in NIL activities
- Schools may impose reasonable limitations on endorsement activity dates and times
- Athletes may hire agents with 7-day notice to the institution
- Disclosure of endorsement deals to the institution required before they become effective
- Mississippi Intercollegiate Athletics Compensation and Publicity Rights Act (2024) authorizes institutional involvement in NIL aligned with House Settlement framework
Sources
MO · Law enacted
Missouri
HB 297 (2021, original); amended by HB 417 (signed August 2023) · Effective August 28, 2021 (substantially amended August 28, 2023)
Missouri's original NIL law (HB 297) took effect August 28, 2021. In 2023, Governor Parson signed HB 417, substantially expanding the law to permit deep institutional involvement in athlete NIL deals — including coach participation in NIL meetings and school-staff facilitation of NIL opportunities. The amendments also authorized athletes to license school logos and colors for their own NIL marketing. Missouri was also a co-plaintiff with Virginia and Tennessee in antitrust actions against the NCAA over recruiting and NIL restrictions.
Key provisions.
- School coaches and officials may attend, participate in, and facilitate NIL discussions and deals on behalf of athletes (post-2023 amendment)
- Athletes may license their school's logo, motto, and colors for NIL marketing and promotion
- Institutions must offer two workshops per calendar year covering financial skills, time management, and entrepreneurship
- High school athletes who have signed a letter of intent with a Missouri institution may sign NIL deals tied to their future enrollment
- Anti-retaliation protections for athletes engaging in permitted NIL activities
- Covers Mizzou, Missouri State, SLU, UMKC, and other Missouri institutions
Sources
MT · Law enacted
Montana
SB 248 (signed by Gov. Gianforte); 2025 amendment Senate-passed, House action pending · Effective June 1, 2023 (2025 amendment pending House action)
Montana's NIL law (SB 248) was signed by Governor Gianforte and went live June 1, 2023. The 2025 Montana Legislature passed (Senate 39-10) an amendment to align state law with the House Settlement, allowing Montana universities to directly compensate student-athletes if institutions opt in. The amendment is pending House action and Governor Gianforte's signature as of the latest reporting.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may earn NIL compensation at Montana colleges and universities
- Anti-restriction provisions and scholarship protections in place
- 2025 Senate-passed amendment would authorize universities to directly compensate athletes under the House Settlement framework (opt-in)
- Disclosure to institution required
NE · Law enacted
Nebraska
LB 962 (Nebraska Student Athlete Name, Image or Likeness Rights Act, 2021); LB 1393 (April 16, 2024 amendment) · Effective July 1, 2021 (amended April 16, 2024)
Nebraska's NIL law (LB 962) was signed by Governor Ricketts and took effect July 1, 2021 — making Nebraska one of the early NIL-enacting states. Senator Ben Hansen's LB 1393, signed April 16, 2024, amended the law to authorize Nebraska universities to actively assist student-athletes with NIL endorsements — including providing legal support, access to team facilities, equipment, social media resources, and university photographers.
Key provisions.
- Institutions may not prevent athletes from fully participating in intercollegiate sports because of NIL earnings
- Universities may assist athletes with NIL endorsements via legal support, facilities, equipment, social media, and photographer resources (post-LB 1393 amendment)
- Athletes must disclose NIL contracts to a designated institutional official
- Scholarship protections in place
Sources
NV · Law enacted
Nevada
AB 254 (signed by Gov. Sisolak) · Effective Enacted May 29, 2021 (provisions phased through January 1, 2022)
Nevada's NIL law (AB 254) was signed by Governor Sisolak and enacted on May 29, 2021, with provisions phasing in through January 1, 2022. Nevada became the 17th state to enact NIL legislation. The law covers UNLV, Nevada (Reno), and other Nevada postsecondary institutions, permitting NIL compensation while preserving institutional authority to impose reasonable restrictions.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may hire professional representation for NIL activities
- Athletes must disclose NIL agreements to a designated school official
- NIL contracts may not conflict with team contracts or institutional contracts
- Schools may impose reasonable restrictions on NIL agreements
- Schools may prohibit compensation for NIL use related to official institutional activities or intercollegiate sports
- Covers UNLV, University of Nevada (Reno), and other Nevada institutions
NH · NCAA policy
New Hampshire
No specific legislation
New Hampshire has not enacted specific NIL legislation. Athletes follow NCAA/applicable association and institutional policies.
Key provisions.
- NCAA/association policy governs
NJ · Law enacted
New Jersey
New Jersey Fair Play Act (S 971, signed by Gov. Murphy) · Effective June 1, 2023
The New Jersey Fair Play Act (S 971) was signed by Governor Murphy and took effect June 1, 2023. The Act applies to four-year postsecondary institutions in New Jersey, including Rutgers, Seton Hall, Princeton, NJIT, and Monmouth. It permits athletes to earn NIL compensation, retain professional representation, and includes a specific list of prohibited endorsement categories.
Key provisions.
- Four-year institutions may not prevent athletes from earning NIL compensation
- Athletes may obtain agent or attorney representation; institutions may not restrict it
- Institutions may not provide a prospective student-athlete with NIL compensation as a recruiting inducement
- Prohibited endorsement categories: adult entertainment, alcohol, gambling/sports betting, tobacco and electronic smoking products, prescription pharmaceuticals, controlled dangerous substances, and weapons (including firearms and ammunition)
- Athletes must disclose NIL contracts to a designated institutional official
NM · Law enacted
New Mexico
Student Athlete Endorsement Act (SB 94, signed by Gov. Lujan Grisham) · Effective July 1, 2021
New Mexico's Student Athlete Endorsement Act (SB 94) was signed by Governor Lujan Grisham and took effect July 1, 2021. The law provides standard NIL rights plus an unusual statutory protection for athlete footwear choice during team activities.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may earn NIL compensation; institutions cannot penalize or prohibit it
- NIL earnings do not affect grant-in-aid, scholarship, or stipend eligibility, amount, duration, or renewal
- Institutions may not arrange third-party NIL compensation as a recruiting inducement
- Footwear protection: institutions cannot prohibit or discourage athletes from wearing footwear of their choice during official team activities (subject to health and reflective-material limits)
- Athletes may obtain professional representation; institutions may not interfere
- Third-party benefits for food, shelter, medical, or insurance do not jeopardize eligibility
Sources
NY · Law enacted
New York
Collegiate Athletic Participation Compensation Act (signed November 2022 by Gov. Hochul); amended July 2023 · Effective January 1, 2023 (amended July 2023)
New York's Collegiate Athletic Participation Compensation Act was signed by Governor Hochul in November 2022, with substantive provisions effective January 1, 2023. A July 2023 amendment strengthened athlete protections by barring the NCAA from imposing penalties on athletes for compliant NIL deals and clarifying that the NCAA, conferences, or athletic associations may not prevent New York colleges from allowing athletes to earn NIL compensation. The law applies to all New York colleges, including community colleges, and established a Community College Athlete NIL Working Group.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may earn NIL compensation; institutions and athletic associations may not prevent it
- Athletes may seek professional representation (agents, attorneys)
- Athletic associations and conferences (including the NCAA) may not penalize athletes for compliant NIL deals (per 2023 amendment)
- Covers all NY institutions including community colleges
- Community College Athlete NIL Working Group established by the statute
NC · Law enacted
North Carolina
Session Law 2021-99 (narrow); Executive Order 223 (rescinded 2024) · Effective July 2, 2021 EO rescinded March 8, 2024; narrow statute (SL 2021-99) remains
North Carolina's comprehensive NIL framework was established by Executive Order 223 (Governor Cooper, July 2, 2021), issued in response to NCAA v. Alston and the NCAA's interim NIL policy. Governor Cooper rescinded EO 223 on March 8, 2024, leaving NC without a comprehensive state NIL framework. A narrower statute — Session Law 2021-99 — remains in force, authorizing NIL agency contracts and exempting NIL contracts from public records requirements at public institutions. NC athletes now operate primarily under NCAA policy and the House Settlement framework, supplemented by SL 2021-99's specific provisions.
Key provisions.
- Comprehensive NIL framework (Executive Order 223) was rescinded March 8, 2024 — no longer in force
- Session Law 2021-99 authorizes NIL agency contracts under NC law
- Session Law 2021-99 exempts NIL contracts from public records disclosure at public institutions
- Following EO 223's rescission, NC athletes operate primarily under NCAA policy and the House Settlement
- Covers all NC institutions including UNC, NC State, Duke, Wake Forest, and others
ND · NCAA policy
North Dakota
No specific legislation
North Dakota has not enacted specific NIL legislation. Athletes follow NCAA/applicable association policies.
Key provisions.
- NCAA/association policy governs
OH · Law enacted
Ohio
Ohio Rev. Code Chapter 3376 (§§ 3376.04, 3376.06, 3376.07) — amended by HB 184 (2026) · Effective Amended HB 184 effective March 19, 2026
Ohio's NIL framework is codified at Ohio Revised Code Chapter 3376. The General Assembly amended the chapter via HB 184, effective March 19, 2026, to update contract review procedures, disclosure rules, and permissible-category restrictions for the post-House Settlement environment. The amended law covers all Ohio colleges and universities including Ohio State, Cincinnati, Miami (OH), Toledo, and others.
Key provisions.
- Athletes must disclose NIL contracts to their institution; contracts may not conflict with institutional rules (Ohio Rev. Code § 3376.06)
- Institutions may prohibit NIL contracts with companies that sell alcohol, marijuana, or adult entertainment (§ 3376.07)
- Institutions and athletic associations may not prevent or interfere with permissible third-party NIL contracts (§ 3376.04)
- Agent and attorney representation permitted
- HB 184 (2026) updated contract-review procedures and limited clauses that could interfere with eligibility or team obligations
OK · Law enacted
Oklahoma
Student Athlete Name, Image, and Likeness Rights Act (signed May 2021 by Gov. Stitt); SB 490 Senate-passed March 2025 (House pending); EO 2025-01 (Gov. Stitt) bridges regulatory gap · Effective May 2021 (Executive Order 2025-01 and SB 490 pending)
Oklahoma's Student Athlete Name, Image, and Likeness Rights Act was signed by Governor Stitt in May 2021. In response to the post-House Settlement environment, Governor Stitt issued Executive Order 2025-01 to bridge the regulatory gap, and SB 490 (sponsored by Sen. Todd Gollihare) was passed by the Oklahoma Senate on March 17, 2025 to provide a long-term legislative solution. SB 490 is pending action in the Oklahoma House.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may earn NIL compensation; institutions may not restrict permitted activities
- Executive Order 2025-01 (Gov. Stitt) currently bridges the gap between state law and the House Settlement framework
- Pending SB 490 would amend the NIL Rights Act to align with the House Settlement, including a salary-cap framework with carve-outs for pre-June 30, 2025 payments
- Scholarship protections in place
OR · Law enacted
Oregon
SB 5 (2021 original); SB 1505 (2022 amendment); HB 4119 (March 6, 2024 amendment) · Effective June 30, 2021 (substantially amended 2022 and 2024)
Oregon's NIL law (SB 5) was signed on June 30, 2021. The Oregon Legislature subsequently amended the law via SB 1505 (effective July 1, 2022) and HB 4119 (effective March 6, 2024). The framework integrates with Oregon's Revised Uniform Athlete Agents Act (UAAA), requiring agent registration and prohibiting representation by anyone who represented an Oregon educational institution in the preceding four years.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may earn NIL compensation at Oregon universities (Oregon, Oregon State, Portland State, others)
- Athlete agents and professional representatives must comply with Oregon's Revised Uniform Athlete Agents Act (UAAA)
- Athletes may not be represented by anyone who in the preceding four years represented an Oregon educational institution
- Anti-restriction and anti-retaliation provisions
- Scholarship protection
PA · Law enacted
Pennsylvania
SB 381 (2021, codified as Article XX-K of the Public School Code); amended by Act 79 (2024) · Effective July 1, 2021 (amended 2024)
Pennsylvania's NIL law (SB 381) was signed by Governor Tom Wolf and took effect July 1, 2021, codified as Article XX-K of the Public School Code. The General Assembly amended the law via Act 79 (2024), relaxing the prior disclosure requirements, exempting executed NIL deals from public disclosure, and explicitly permitting institutional officials to participate in NIL discussions with athletes. The amendments brought Pennsylvania closer to the more institution-friendly framework adopted by other states. Covered institutions include Penn State, Pitt, Temple, Villanova, and others.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may earn NIL compensation; prohibited categories include alcohol, adult entertainment, gambling, tobacco and electronic smoking products, prescription pharmaceuticals, and controlled substances
- Pay-for-play prohibited: compensation may not be conditioned on attendance at, or participation in, a particular institution
- Institutional officials may participate in NIL discussions with student-athletes (post-2024 amendment)
- Disclosure to the institution required, but the prior one-week reporting timeline was relaxed by the 2024 amendment
- Executed NIL deals are not public records and may remain confidential
Sources
RI · NCAA policy
Rhode Island
No specific legislation
Rhode Island has not enacted specific NIL legislation. Athletes follow NCAA/applicable association policies.
Key provisions.
- NCAA/association policy governs
SC · Law enacted
South Carolina
Original 2021 law amended by H. 4957 (signed by Gov. McMaster, May 21, 2024) · Effective July 1, 2021 (substantially amended May 21, 2024)
South Carolina's original NIL law took effect July 1, 2021. Governor McMaster signed H. 4957 on May 21, 2024, substantially expanding institutional involvement in athlete NIL deals. The 2024 amendment authorizes institutions and their personnel to identify, create, solicit, facilitate, and otherwise enable NIL opportunities for currently enrolled athletes — but prohibits institutions from receiving compensation directly from athletes and bars use of appropriated funds for NIL compensation. The amendment also caps agent commissions at 30% and authorizes schools to provide tax guidance and integrate intellectual property into deals. 2025-2026 legislation pending in the Senate would shield individual NIL agreements from public records disclosure.
Key provisions.
- Institutions, officers, trustees, directors, and employees may directly or through a third party identify, create, solicit, facilitate, and enable NIL opportunities for enrolled athletes (H. 4957, 2024)
- Institutions may not receive compensation directly from athletes for NIL facilitation
- Appropriated state funds may not be used to pay athletes for NIL
- Agent commissions capped at 30%
- Schools may provide tax guidance and integrate intellectual property into NIL deals
- Pending 2025-2026 legislation would shield individual NIL agreements from public records (institutions would report only aggregate total payouts)
SD · NCAA policy
South Dakota
No specific legislation
South Dakota has not enacted specific NIL legislation. Athletes follow NCAA/NAIA and institutional policies.
Key provisions.
- NCAA/NAIA policy governs
TN · Law enacted
Tennessee
Intercollegiate Athlete Name, Image, and Likeness Act (amended by SB 536 / HB 194, signed May 1, 2025) · Effective 2021 (substantially amended May 2025)
Tennessee was an early NIL state and has subsequently positioned itself as one of the most aggressive jurisdictions on athlete compensation. In May 2025, Governor Bill Lee signed SB 536/HB 194, substantially expanding the state's NIL law. The amended statute allows unlimited NIL compensation for Tennessee student-athletes unless expressly limited by federal law, a valid court order, or an antitrust exemption — and provides that Tennessee institutions need not follow NCAA rules that lessen full and free competition affecting Tennessee. Tennessee was also a co-plaintiff (with Virginia) in Tennessee v. NCAA, the antitrust action that struck down NCAA NIL recruiting restrictions.
Key provisions.
- Unlimited NIL compensation permitted unless expressly limited by federal law, court order, or antitrust exemption
- Tennessee institutions need not follow NCAA rules that lessen or tend to lessen full and free competition affecting Tennessee
- Institutions and affiliated collectives are shielded from liability related to NIL compensation; liability shifts to the NCAA if its rules are deemed unlawful
- Athletes may engage agents, attorneys, and other professional representation for NIL deals
- Tennessee covers all in-state institutions (University of Tennessee, Vanderbilt, Memphis, MTSU, ETSU, others)
TX · Law enacted
Texas
Tex. Educ. Code § 51.9246 (originally SB 1385, 2021; amended by HB 126, 2025) · Effective July 1, 2021 (amended 2025)
Texas was an early NIL state with SB 1385 (effective July 1, 2021), codified at Texas Education Code § 51.9246. In 2025, the legislature passed HB 126 (89th Legislature), substantially amending the statute to align with the House Settlement era. The amendment eliminated prior restrictions that prevented institutions from providing or soliciting NIL compensation, expanded rights to professional legal and marketing representation, and authorized Texas public universities to compensate student-athletes directly.
Key provisions.
- Texas public universities may directly compensate student-athletes for NIL, consistent with the House Settlement revenue-share framework
- Athletes may obtain professional legal, marketing, and agent representation; institutions may not prevent it
- Every NIL contract must be disclosed to the institution before signing for compliance and fair-market-value review
- Contracts may not extend beyond the athlete's intercollegiate participation
- NIL compensation may not be conditioned on athletic performance or attendance at the institution
- Statutory bans on NIL deals involving gambling, tobacco/vaping, alcohol, or adult-oriented businesses
- High school athletes age 17 or older may sign NIL agreements with payment deferred until enrollment in a Texas institution
UT · Law enacted
Utah
Student Athlete Amendments — HB 202 (signed March 12, 2024; effective May 1, 2024); HB 479 (2025 Student Athlete Revisions) · Effective May 1, 2024 (substantially updated by HB 202; further amended HB 479 in 2025)
Utah's current NIL framework was substantially rewritten by HB 202, signed by the Governor on March 12, 2024 and effective May 1, 2024. HB 479 in the 2025 legislative session further amended the law to authorize Utah student-athletes to receive direct NIL compensation without losing eligibility, while imposing financial oversight that prevents tuition and state funds from covering NIL payments.
Key provisions.
- Athletes may receive direct NIL compensation (HB 479, 2025); eligibility protected
- Prohibited endorsement categories: tobacco products, drugs, strip clubs, gambling, alcohol, and firearms the athlete cannot legally purchase
- Athletes must disclose NIL agreements exceeding $600 to their institution for review
- Athletes must obtain written institutional permission to use institutional logos, uniforms, or facilities in NIL activities (market-rate fee for facility use)
- Institutions may not use public funds for student-athlete NIL agreements
- Anti-retaliation: institutions may not disqualify athletes from scholarships, grants, or financial assistance for earning NIL compensation or hiring representation
VT · NCAA policy
Vermont
No specific legislation
Vermont has not enacted specific NIL legislation. Athletes follow NCAA and institutional policies.
Key provisions.
- NCAA policy governs
VA · Law enacted
Virginia
Va. Code § 23.1-408.1 (intercollegiate NIL) — amended by HB 1505 (2024) and HB 971 (2026) · Effective Substantially amended by HB 1505 (April 2024); HB 971 effective 2026
Virginia's NIL framework is codified at Virginia Code § 23.1-408.1. In April 2024, Governor Youngkin signed HB 1505 — among the first state laws explicitly authorizing institutions to directly compensate student-athletes for NIL and prohibiting the NCAA from punishing schools or athletes for such institutional compensation. The 2024 amendment positioned Virginia ahead of the federal House Settlement on direct institutional pay. Virginia was also a co-plaintiff (with Tennessee) in Tennessee v. NCAA, the antitrust action that struck down NCAA NIL recruiting restrictions. HB 971 (2026) added protections for student-athlete biometric data, prohibiting disclosure without consent and banning biometric-data conditions in NIL contracts.
Key provisions.
- Institutions may directly compensate student-athletes for NIL; the NCAA may not punish schools or athletes for such direct compensation (HB 1505, 2024)
- Institutions and their supporting foundations may identify, create, negotiate, facilitate, or otherwise enable NIL opportunities for student-athletes
- Student-athlete biometric data may not be disclosed without consent, and may not be a condition of NIL contracts (HB 971, 2026)
- Athletes may engage agents and attorneys for NIL representation
- Covers Virginia, Virginia Tech, George Mason, JMU, ODU, and all other Virginia postsecondary institutions
WA · Law enacted
Washington
SB 5913 (signed by Gov. Inslee, March 13, 2024) · Effective June 6, 2024
Washington's NIL law (SB 5913) was signed by Governor Inslee on March 13, 2024 and took effect June 6, 2024. The statute expressly permits the use of public resources by employees of state institutions of higher education to advise, facilitate, acknowledge, or educate student-athletes on NIL matters, so long as such use complies with NCAA rules. The law covers UW, Washington State, Eastern Washington, Central Washington, and other Washington postsecondary institutions.
Key provisions.
- Public-institution employees may use institutional resources (personnel, money, property) to advise, facilitate, acknowledge, or educate athletes on NIL — subject to NCAA rules
- Athletes may earn NIL compensation; institutions may not penalize compliant activities
- Covers UW, WSU, Eastern Washington, Central Washington, Western Washington, and other Washington institutions
- Use of public resources must adhere to rules established by national governing body for college sports
DC · NCAA policy
Washington D.C.
No specific legislation
Washington D.C. has not enacted specific NIL legislation. Athletes at D.C. institutions follow NCAA and institutional policies.
Key provisions.
- Governed by NCAA/applicable association policies
WV · Law enacted
West Virginia
NIL Protection Act (HB 2576, signed by Gov. Morrisey, September 2025) · Effective Signed September 2025
West Virginia's NIL Protection Act (HB 2576) was signed by Governor Patrick Morrisey in September 2025 — making West Virginia among the most recent states to enact NIL legislation. The Act provides a comprehensive framework allowing student-athletes to receive NIL compensation from schools or third parties, authorizes colleges and universities to engage in direct revenue sharing with athletes, and explicitly bars athletic associations from penalizing athletes for NIL activities.
Key provisions.
- Student-athletes may receive NIL compensation from schools or third parties (direct school payment authorized)
- Colleges and universities may engage in revenue sharing with athletes
- Athletic associations may not penalize athletes for permitted NIL activities
- Prohibited categories: alcohol, gambling, cannabis, and adult content
- Legislative appropriations may not be used to pay NIL compensation
- Athletes may retain legal or professional representation
- Covers WVU, Marshall, West Virginia State, and other WV institutions
WI · Law enacted
Wisconsin
2025 Wisconsin Act 203 (AB 1034, signed by Gov. Evers, 2026) · Effective Signed 2026 (2025 Wisconsin Act 203)
Wisconsin's NIL framework was established by AB 1034, codified as 2025 Wisconsin Act 203, signed into law by Governor Tony Evers in 2026 after passing the Assembly 95-1 and the Senate 17-16. The Act provides $14.6 million annually in state funds for UW-Madison's athletic facilities and additional funding for UW-Milwaukee and UW-Green Bay, while establishing NIL rules for UW system athletes. UW institutions may contract with organizations to help athletes find NIL opportunities. The law also exempts records related to intercollegiate athletic program revenue from the state's open records law to protect competitive interests and student privacy.
Key provisions.
- Wisconsin institutions may help athletes find and engage in NIL opportunities
- Prohibited endorsement categories: alcoholic beverages, gambling, banned athletic substances, illegal activities or substances
- NIL contracts may not conflict with school policies or provide money in exchange for athletic performance
- Athletes must disclose third-party NIL deals
- Records related to intercollegiate athletic program revenue are exempt from state open records law
- Covers UW system institutions (UW-Madison, UW-Milwaukee, UW-Green Bay, and others) plus Marquette and other Wisconsin colleges
WY · NCAA policy
Wyoming
No specific legislation
Wyoming has not enacted specific NIL legislation. Athletes follow NCAA and institutional policies.
Key provisions.
- NCAA policy governs